Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;17(5):1405–1412. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-02955-5

Table 1.

Comparison of pro-calcitonin levels based on bacterial co-infections (Cohort 1)

Absence/low-suspicion of bacterial co-infection Proven bacterial co-infection P value
Non-ICU, n (%) 892 (96.5)a 32 (3.5)
Median (IQR, Range) 0.16 (0.08–0.36, < 0.06–87.4) 0.64 (0.16–2.87, < 0.06–92.0) 0.014
 < 0.25 µg/L, n (%) 576 (64.6) 10 (31.3)  < 0.001
 ≥ 0.25 µg/L, n (%) 316 (35.4) 22 (68.8)
ICU, n (%) 95 (92.2)b 8 (7.8)
Median (IQR, Range) 0.37 (0.17–1.04, < 0.06–242.4) 1.3 (0.19–19.5, 0.08–202.2 0.257
 < 0.25 µg/L, n (%) 31 (32.6) 2 (25) 1.0
 ≥ 0.25 µg/L, n (%) 64 (67.4) 6 (75)

a7.8% were classified as absence of co-infection and 88.7% as low-suspicion of co-infection

b3.9% were classified as absence of co-infection and 88.3% were classified as low suspicion of co-infection