Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 24.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2021 Dec 24;38(4):241–249. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001016

Table 2:

Pearson correlations (r) between movement-evoked pain, pain characteristics, demographics, and self-perceived and performance-based function

Age Sex BMI LBP
Duration
MPQ-
PRI
Composite
LBP
Intensity
MeP LLFDI TUG
Age 1
Sex −0.091 1
BMI −0.023 −0.096 1
LBP Duration −0.060 −0.056 0.144* 1
MPQ-PRI −0.151* 0.098 0.195** −0.081 1
Composite LBP −0.082 0.101 0.111 0.003 0.368** 1
MeP −0.073 0.165** 0.029 −0.087 0.354** 0.550** 1
LLFDI −0.144* −0.216** −0.319** 0.034 −0.276** −0.306** −0.337** 1
TUG 0.240** 0.106* 0.182** 0.017 0.081 0.200** 0.203** −0.471** 1

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; LBP = low back pain; LLFDI = Late Life Function and Disability Index; MeP = Movement-Evoked Pain; MPQ-PRI = McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain Rating Index; TUG = Timed Up-and-Go Test

*

p<0.050

**

p<0.010

Note: sex correlation coefficients from Kendall’s tau