Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;12:4305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08253-6

Table 3.

Comparison of post-operative residual astigmatism prediction error at 2 diameter zones and subgroup analyses.

Parameter(D) 2.4 mm 3.3 mm P value
Total (n = 101)
Mean ± SD 0.51 ± 0.46 0.46 ± 0.36 p = 0.799
Centroid ± SD 0.09 ± 0.68 @87 0.09 ± 0.58 @25 p = 0.003*(x-axis); 0.123 (y-axis)
WTR (n = 47)
Mean ± SD 0.34 ± 0.24 0.38 ± 0.26 p = 0.250
Centroid ± SD 0.07 ± 0.42 @ 8 0.12 ± 0.45 @ 19 p = 0.485 (x-axis); 0.031* (y-axis)
ATR (n = 33)
Mean ± SD 0.62 ± 0.50 0.53 ± 0.48 p = 0.413
Centroid ± SD 0.32 ± 0.74 @88 0.07 ± 0.72 @ 52 p = 0.024* (x-axis); 0.479(y-axis)
Oblique (n = 21)
Mean ± SD 0.70 ± 0.65 0.52 ± 0.32 p = 0.934
Centroid ± SD 0.09 ± 0.96 @101 0.09 ± 0.61 @15 p = 0.002* (x-axis); 0.573(y-axis)