Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 11;12:4296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08325-7

Table 2.

Cumulative incidence ratio (risk ratio) for posterior capsule opacification and Nd:YAG capsulotomy, and mean differences in logMAR levels over 36-month follow-up between the Acrysof (SN60WF, reference) and iSert groups (XY-1 or 251/255, index).

Comparison iSert XY-1 vs. Acrysof (SN60WF) iSert 251/255 vs. Acrysof (SN60WF)
Analyses Crude Adjusted*1 Crude Adjusted*1
Effect estimate Risk ratio (95% CI) Risk ratio (95% CI)
Posterior capsule opacification
36 months 1.76 (0.93, 3.35) 0.99 (0.43, 2.28) 2.98 (1.81, 4.92) 2.39 (1.50, 3.79)
Nd:YAG capsulotomy
36 months 3.21 (1.05, 9.80) 4.42 (1.18, 16.5) 3.50 (1.20, 10.21) 4.56 (1.01, 20.5)
LogMAR, Mean Difference (95% CI)
3 months 0.00 (− 0.26, 0.26) 0.00 (− 0.26, 0.25) − 0.14 (− 0.43, 0.15) − 0.14 (− 0.43, 0.14)
6 months − 0.09 (− 0.36, 0.17) − 0.07 (− 0.33, 0.19) − 0.15 (− 0.43, 0.13) − 0.15 (− 0.43, 0.12)
12 months − 0.05 (− 0.33, 0.23) − 0.04 (− 0.31, 0.24) − 0.09 (− 0.38, 0.21) − 0.10 (− 0.39, 0.19)
36 months − 0.09 (− 0.42, 0.24) − 0.07 (− 0.40, 0.26) − 0.10 (− 0.42, 0.23) − 0.12 (− 0.44, 0.20)

For the adjusted model, age, sex, diabetes mellitus, and sarcoidosis were included as covariates (*1).

SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, LogMAR log of the minimum angle of resolution.