Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 21;2015(7):CD009849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009849.pub3

Comparison 3. DMPA: use versus nonuse.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Fractures (per woman‐years) 1 1.722356E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.41 [1.35, 1.47]
2 Fractures (per woman‐year) by exposure 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Low: 1 to 7 DMPA injections 1 1.639319E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.47 [1.40, 1.54]
2.2 High: 8 or more DMPA injections 1 1.478078E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [1.13, 1.32]
3 Fractures (per woman‐years) by site 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Axial 1 1.722356E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.74, 1.23]
3.2 Appendicular skeleton 1 1.722356E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.38 [1.31, 1.46]
3.3 All other fractures 1 1.722356E6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.49 [1.39, 1.59]