Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 12;11:48. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01081-3

Table 2.

Antibiotic use within six months prior to detection of VREfm in the study population

All patients
(n = 33)
VREfm-colonised patients
(n = 26)
VREfm-colonised patients with suspected infection
(n = 7)
p value*
Antibiotics total, median (range) 5 (0–14) 5 (0–14) 7 (3–14) 0.150
Antibiotic classes, n (%)
Aminoglycosides 5 (15.2) 5 (19.2) 0 (0.0) 0.559
Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor 22 (66.7) 16 (61.5) 6 (85.7) 0.378
Carbapenems 16 (48.5) 10 (38.5) 6 (85.7) 0.039
First-generation cephalosporins 3 (9.1) 3 (11.5) 0 (0.0) 1.000
Fluoroquinolones 1 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3) 0.212
Glycopeptides 11 (33.3) 9 (34.6) 2 (28.6) 1.000
Imidazoles 4 (12.1) 3 (11.5) 1 (14.3) 1.000
Macrolides 6 (18.2) 6 (23.1) 0 (0.0) 0.301
Penicillins 12 (36.4) 11 (42.3) 1 (14.3) 0.223
Phosphonics 1 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3) 0.212
Second-generation cephalosporins 8 (24.2) 7 (26.9) 1 (14.3) 0.652
Third-generation cephalosporins 14 (42.4) 13 (50.0) 1 (14.3) 0.195
Trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations 9 (27.3) 5 (19.2) 4 (57.1) 0.068
Unknown antibiotic class 2 (6.1) 2 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 1.000
Antibiotic groups AWaRe classification
Access Antibiotics, median (range) 1 (0–6) 1 (0–6) 1 (0–3) 0.629
Watch Antibiotics, median (range) 4 (0–13) 3 (0–13) 4 (2–12) 0.120

Signficant values (marked in bold) were defined as p < 0.05

VREfm, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

*Fisher’s exact test or Mann–Whitney U test (p  < 0.05 was considered significant)

excluding two unknown antibiotics