Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;10:e12734. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12734

Table 3. Comparisons between Microlaimus campiensis sp. n. and morphologically similar species (only males).

Species L a b c 2nd ceph ccl Amph% cs/hd hd/mbd spic/abd
M. campiensis sp. n. 800–880 20–23.5 5.7–6 8.5–8.9 papilliform 28.5 0.5 1.8 1.3
M. affinis 710–892 22.9–26 6.1–7.1 9–10.3 papilliform 34 0.4 1.9 1
M. cyatholaimoides 700–1,000 22–31 6.8-7.8 9.7–12.7 papilliform 35 0.4 2.9–3.6 1.5
M. lunatus 1,200–1,300 41 8.3 14 setiform 47–54 0.5 2.3–2.5 1.6–1.8
M. papillatus 960 44 7 11.3 setiform 65 0.5 1.3 1.3

Note:

For abbreviations see Table 1.