Table 3. Comparisons between Microlaimus campiensis sp. n. and morphologically similar species (only males).
| Species | L | a | b | c | 2nd ceph ccl | Amph% | cs/hd | hd/mbd | spic/abd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. campiensis sp. n. | 800–880 | 20–23.5 | 5.7–6 | 8.5–8.9 | papilliform | 28.5 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| M. affinis | 710–892 | 22.9–26 | 6.1–7.1 | 9–10.3 | papilliform | 34 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 1 |
| M. cyatholaimoides | 700–1,000 | 22–31 | 6.8-7.8 | 9.7–12.7 | papilliform | 35 | 0.4 | 2.9–3.6 | 1.5 |
| M. lunatus | 1,200–1,300 | 41 | 8.3 | 14 | setiform | 47–54 | 0.5 | 2.3–2.5 | 1.6–1.8 |
| M. papillatus | 960 | 44 | 7 | 11.3 | setiform | 65 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Note:
For abbreviations see Table 1.