Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;10:e12734. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12734

Table 5. Comparison between Microlaimus alexandri sp. n. and morphologically similar species (only males).

Species L a b c 2nd ceph ccl Amph% cs/hd hd/mbd spic/abd
M. alexandri sp. n. 1,146–1,173 33.2–41 7–7.4 11.5–13.6 papilliform 100% male
32% female
0.6 2.3–2.7 1.1
M. amphidius 720–852 32.1–39.4 7.9 9–11.3 setiform 100% male
30% female
0.5 1.6 1.2
M. monstrosus 1,104–1,537 48–59 8.5–10.6 11.8–12.4 papilliform 100% male
45% female
1 1.7 1.3
M. ostracion 1,150–1,310 42–45 7.7–8.7 9.9–11.5 setiform 33% male
33%female
1.1 1.8–2.2 1.1

Note:

For abbreviations see Table 1.