Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;10:e12734. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12734

Table 7. Comparison of Microlaimus vitorius sp. n. and morphologically similar species (only males).

Species L a b c 2nd ceph ccl Amph% amph. pos/hd cs/hd hd/mbd spic/abd
M. vitorius sp. n. 1,696–1,921 28.6 8.8 12.6 papilliform 37.5–53 0.4–0.7 0.8 3.7 1
M. acinaces 945–1,227 29–38.5 6.5 11.9–15 setiform 58–65 0.8–1 0.5 2.3 1–1.3
M. cyatholaimoides 700–1,000 22–31 6.8–7.8 9.7–12.7 papilliform 35 1.5–1.7 0.4 2.9–3.6 1.5
M. discolensis 425–560 15.2–18.7 6.6 8.5–10.6 setiform 59 1.1 0.5 1.9–2.1 1.3
M. porosus 380–644 21 4.9 5.4 papilliform 40–50 1.9 0.4 2.2 1.8
M. parviporosus 360–415 30.2–25.9 4.6–5.2 7.3–8.3 setiform 55–67 1.6 0.2 1.8–2 1.5

Note:

For abbreviations see Table 1.