Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 12;13(4):635–649. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01244-w

Table 2.

Summary of intervention, patient, and outcome characteristics

Author year Participants Intervention and control Outcome measures Significant findings

Gordon 2020 [20]

USA

87 T2D rural living veterans, HbA1c 8.5%

12-min video and pamphlet designed to improve provider-patient communication during video consultation

Fully digital solution

One off session

Control: Pamphlet version of provider-patient communication support

Ratings for post-visit provider-patient therapeutic alliance Patients who watched a pre-visit educational video before their telehealth video consultation reported higher therapeutic alliance scores post-visit than the control group
Gunawardena 2019 [27] Sri Lanka

67 T2D patients

Mean age 52 years, 40% female, HbA1c 9.4%

Mobile app designed to support glucose management

Fully digital solution

6 months

Control: Usual care

App usage

HbA1c

Significantly lower A1c levels compared to the control group were observed over 6 months

A1c improvement was positively correlated with app usage with over 80% using the app 8–9 times/week and 52% 12 times or more/week and 78% at 6 months

Kerfoot 2017 [19]

USA

456 T2D veterans,

Mean age 60 years, 6.% female,

HbA1c 9.0%

Online diabetes self-management game with integrated teams competition

Integrated solution

6 months

Control: non-diabetes related game

HbA1c The intervention group had significantly greater reductions in mean HbA1c over 6 months compared to the control

Kusnanto 2019 [26]

Indonesia

65 T2D patient

57% female,

HbA1c 8.5%

Diabetes calendar app for SM education program

Fully digital solution

3 months

Control: Leaflet version of SM education program

Diabetes management self-efficacy scale (DMSES)

HbA1c

Cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL-c, insulin level

The intervention group had a significantly higher self-efficacy scores than the control group

The intervention group had a significantly lower mean HbA1c levels than the control group

The intervention group had a significantly better cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL-c, and insulin levels than the control group

Poppe 2019 [23]

Belgium

54 T2D patients

Mean age 63 years, 27% female

Website and app designed to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior

Fully digital solution

5 weeks

Control: Wait-list control

Accelerometer assessed breaks from sedentary time The intervention group displayed a significant increase in accelerometer-assessed breaks from sedentary time in comparison with the control group

Capozza 2015 [18]

USA

93 T2D patients

Mean age 53 years 61% female

Two-way SMS system designed to improve glycemic control through coaching, education and testing reminders

Fully digital solution

180 days

Control: Usual care

CSQ-8 (8-question Client Satisfaction Questionniare)

Satisfaction survey

Frequency of engagement

HbA1c

Mean satisfaction score was 27.7/32 at 180 days

85% said “yes” to having improved disease knowledge and management strategies

94% said "yes” they would recommend intervention others

29% demonstrated frequent engagement (texting responses at least 3 × per week for ≥ 90 days)

Both groups had decreased HbA1c but there was no significant difference between them

Hilmarsdottir 2020 [25]

Iceland

37 T2D patients

Mean age 51yrs, 63% female,

HbA1c 7.8%

Gamified app designed to support healthy lifestyle behaviors with the option to compete with other users

Integrated solution

6 months

Control: Usual care

Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) Satisfaction survey

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

HbA1c

There was a significant decrease in the intervention group (but not between groups) in diabetes distress anxiety symptoms and HbA1c levels

Lee 2020 [22]

South Korea

72 T2D patients

Mean age 50 years, 68% female, HbA1c 7.4%

Diabetes self-management education app with individualized feedback from health care professionals via the app

Integrated solution

6 months

Control: Usual care

Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQc)

HbA1c

The intervention group had a significantly higher rates of treatment satisfaction than the control group

Whittemore 2019 [29]

Mexico

47 T2D patients

Mean age 56 years, 68% female

Diabetes self-management group sessions (in-person) followed by a texting system to support behavior change

Integrated solution

7.6 months

Control: Usual care

Diabetes self-efficacy

Blood glucose monitoring

HbA1c

In the intervention group, HbA1c score, diet, and exercise was significantly improved (but not in comparison to the control)

Xu 2020 [21]

USA

65 low-income, mostly African American T2D patients

Mean age 55 years, 68% female, HbA1c 9.5%

SMS/phone system designed to improve reduce HbA1c and fasting blood glucose (FBG) self-management through automated contact and some bidirectional communication

Integrated solution

6 months

Control: Reduced version of digital intervention (i.e., weekly only SMS and no bidirectional communication)

Engagement as measured by proportion responding to ≥ 25% of texts or calls over 4 weeks

Fasting blood glucose

HbA1c

Engagement was 58% for the intervention group and 48% for the control group

The intervention groups had significantly decreased HbA1c and self-reported fasting blood glucose while the control group did not