Table 2.
Recommendation | Action |
---|---|
1. Establish patient phenotypes by unifying and harmonizing data to understand differences and similarities across populations | • TBI research, diagnosis, management, recovery, and prognosis make use of a broad and often disparate spectrum of measures. Where appropriate, incorporating multiple data types per study can advance our understanding of phenotypes by promoting interdisciplinary perspectives. |
2. Develop, validate, and standardize tools and assessments | • When designing new studies, consider analysis pipelines and tools used in earlier phenotyping reports. • Incorporate the use of common data elements to improve collaboration and synthesis of findings. • Renew efforts toward data sharing, consistency, and collaboration to provide common reference points. |
3. Develop registries or repositories, democratize data, and prioritize privacy | • Use public data sets to explore and validate methods and outcomes at scale. • Adopt policies for tool sharing, which enables valuable comparisons and validation of phenotypes across studies and data sets. • Adopt policies for knowledge sharing of negative or contradictory results, which will allow the community to identify contexts that confound conventional understanding. |
4. Identify and integrate constellations of phenotype data from different modalities | • Efforts to identify phenotypes within and across populations should be driven by the need to target the right participants into the right TBI clinical trials and accelerate treatments into practice. |
TBI, traumatic brain injury.