| Study |
Reason for exclusion |
| Rajasekaran UB, Krishna Nayak US (2014). Effect of prostaglandin E1 versus corticotomy on orthodontic tooth movement: an in vivo study. Indian Journal of Dental Research: official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research. 25(6):717-21 |
The study did not apply surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they were applied separately in the same group of patients |
| Muñoz F, Jiménez C, Espinoza D, Vervelle A, Beugnet J, Haidar Z (2016). Use of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO): Clinical effects on edema and pain. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 8(2), |
A cohort observational study; did not detect the tooth movement acceleration; it used leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) to detect edema and pain |
| El-Ashmawi N, Abd El-Ghafour M, Nasr S, Fayed M, El-Beialy A, Nasef E (2018). Effect of surgical corticotomy versus low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the rate of canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Orthodontic Practice US. 9:1-11 |
The study did not apply surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they were applied separately in the same group of patients |
| Haliloglu-Ozkan T, Arici N, Arici S (2018). In-vivo effects of flapless osteopuncture-facilitated tooth movement in the maxilla and the mandible. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10(8), e761 |
The study compared the repeated application of osteopuncture against conventional orthodontic treatment |
| Sedky Y, Refaat W, Gutknecht N, ElKadi A (2019). Comparison between the effect of low-level laser therapy and corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics on RANKL release during orthodontic tooth movement: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers in Dental Science. 3(2):99-109 |
The study did not apply surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they were applied separately in the same group of patients |
| Abdarazik MA, Ibrahim SA, Hartsfield JK, AlAhmady HH (2020). The effect of using full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap versus low-level laser application on orthodontic tooth movement acceleration. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 7(2 April-Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics issue (Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics)):285-93 |
The study did not apply surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they were applied separately in the same group of patients |
| Teh NHK, Sivarajan S, Asif MK, Ibrahim N, Wey MC (2020). Distribution of mandibular trabeculae bone volume fraction in relation to different MOP intervals for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized controlled trial. The Angle Orthodontist, 90(6), 774-782 |
The study aimed to investigate the effect of different intervals of micro-osteoperforation on the horizontal and vertical distribution of mandibular trabecular bone volume fraction |
| Türker G, Yavuz İ, Gönen ZB (2020). Which method is more effective for accelerating canine distalization short term, low-level laser therapy or piezocision? A split-mouth study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. :1-9 |
The study did not apply surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they were applied separately in the same group of patients |
| CTRI/2018/05/014328: Comparison of micro-osteoperforation and low-level laser therapy on the rate of retraction-an in vivo study |
Ongoing trial (protocol): the study is not applying surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they are applied separately in the same group of patients |
|
NCT03308851: Evaluation of the effects of osteoperforation and piezocorticision on canine retraction |
Ongoing trial (protocol): the study is not applying surgical and non-surgical acceleration methods together, but they are applied separately in the same group of patients |
