Table 3.

Results of Multilevel Models Examining Moderators of Switching and Stopping Rate

	Coefficient (SE)	z	p	95% CI Lower, Upper
Switching rate
Emotional Awareness
Group	2.06 (1.29)	1.6	0.11	−0.46, 4.59
Emotional Awareness	0.01 (0.02)	0.83	0.41	−0.02, 0.04
Group × Emotional Awareness	−0.01 (0.02)	−0.87	0.39	−0.05, 0.02
Self-efficacy
Group	0.97 (1.51)	0.64	0.52	−1.99, 3.92
Self-efficacy	0 (0.02)	0.15	0.88	−0.04, 0.04
Group × Self-efficacy	0 (0.02)	0.07	0.95	−0.04, 0.05
Effort
Group	0.59 (1.72)	0.35	0.73	−2.78, 3.97
Effort	0.01 (0.02)	0.63	0.53	−0.03, 0.05
Group × Effort	0.01 (0.02)	0.26	0.80	−0.04, 0.05
Stopping rate
Emotional Awareness
Group	0.34 (0.89)	0.39	0.69	−1.39, 2.09
Emotional Awareness	0 (0.01)	−0.38	0.71	−0.02, 0.02
Group × Emotional Awareness	0.01 (0.01)	0.84	0.40	−0.01, 0.03
Self-efficacy
Group	−2.32 (1.2)	−1.94	0.05	−4.67, 0.02
Self-efficacy	−0.05 (0.02)	−3.46	< .001	−0.09, −0.02
Group × Self-efficacy	0.05 (0.02)	2.86	0.004	0.02, 0.09
Effort
Group	1.07 (1.24)	0.86	0.39	−1.36, 3.5
Effort	0.01 (0.01)	0.92	0.36	−0.01, 0.04
Group × Effort	0 (0.02)	−0.09	0.93	−0.03, 0.03

Note. Switching rate = percentage of surveys where participants endorsed switching. Stopping rate = percentage of surveys where participants reported they had stopped regulating.