Table 4.
Results of image evaluation using Likert scales (mean scores ± standard deviation [StDev]) for evaluations of reader 1 [R1] and reader 2 [R2].
| SD | LD | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall image quality | |||
| R1 | 1.60 ± 0.85 | 1.54 ± 0.74 | 0.46 |
| R2 | 1.59 ± 0.80 | 1.53 ± 0.82 | 0.44 |
| Kappa | 0.83 | 0.86 | |
| Overall artifacts | |||
| R1 | 1.51 ± 0.87 | 1.38 ± 0.72 | 0.17 |
| R2 | 1.46 ± 0.80 | 1.43 ± 0.79 | 0.65 |
| Kappa | 0.87 | 0.87 | |
| Image contrast | |||
| R1 | 1.30 ± 0.61 | 1.21 ± 0.49 | 0.22 |
| R2 | 1.28 ± 0.49 | 1.42 ± 0.62 | 0.04 |
| Kappa | 0.73 | 0.62 | |
| Determination of nerve root | |||
| R1 | 1.13 ± 0.34 | 1.12 ± 0.35 | 0.99 |
| R2 | 1.16 ± 0.37 | 1.10 ± 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Kappa | 0.72 | 0.83 | |
| Confidence for intervention planning | |||
| R1 | 1.13 ± 0.34 | 1.12 ± 0.35 | 0.99 |
| R2 | 1.11 ± 0.31 | 1.10 ± 0.33 | 0.99 |
| Kappa | 0.72 | 0.83 | |
| Confidence for intervention procedure | |||
| R1 | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 0.99 |
| R2 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 0.99 |
| Kappa | 0.80 | 0.49 | |