Table 7.

Facilities readiness (n = 28).

Item		Frequency	Percent
Core Readiness
The facility conducted prior	No never considered	12	42.9
DHI needs assessment	No, but have considered	7	25
	Yes, in progress	7	25
	Yes, nearly completed	2	7.1
	Total	28	100
The facility has a plan to	No never considered	12	42.9
adopt technologies	No, but have considered	6	21.4
	Yes, in progress	8	28.6
	Yes, nearly completed	2	7.1
	Total	28	100
Organizational Cultural Readiness
End users involved in	No never considered	14	50
planning process	No, but have considered	9	32.1
	Yes, rarely participated	1	3.6
	Yes, participated	4	14.3
	Total	28	100
The facility identified	Strongly disagree	1	3.6
collaborators.	Disagree	4	14.3
	Neural	5	17.9
	Agree	7	25
	Strongly agree	11	39.3
	Total	28	100
DHI initiatives supported	Strongly disagree	5	17.9
by management	Disagree	4	14.3
	Neural	2	9.8
	Agree	10	33
	Strongly agree	7	25
	Total	28	100
Value proposition readiness
Existing DHIs support care	Strongly disagree	3	10.7
delivery mission	Disagree	3	10.7
	Neural	3	10.7
	Agree	8	28.6
	Strongly agree	11	39.3
	Total	28	100
Patients' safety assurance	Strongly disagree	0	0
is in place	Disagree	1	3.6
	Neural	1	3.6
	Agree	9	32.1
	Strongly agree	17	60.7
	Total	28	100
Technological readiness
Practical viability DHIs	No never considered	7	25
checked	No, but have considered	4	14.3
	Yes, in progress	10	35.7
	Yes, nearly completed	4	14.3
	Yes, in place	3	10.7
	Total	28	100
Facility examined the DHIs	No never considered	10	35.7
to be implemented	No, but have considered	5	17.9
	Yes, in progress	5	17.9
	Yes, nearly completed	6	21.4
	Yes, in place	2	7.1
	Total	28	100
Guideline on the use of	No never considered	12	42.9
technology available	No, but have considered	5	17.9
	Yes, on process/ in progress	6	21.4
	Yes, nearly completed	3	10.7
	Yes, in place	2	7.1
	Total	28	100
Patient data protection	No never considered	2	7.1
measures are in place	No, but have considered	5	17.9
	Yes, on process/in progress	8	28.6
	Yes, nearly completed	7	25
	Yes, in place	6	21.4
	Total	28	100
Operational resource readiness
DHI tools for providers and	No never considered	11	39.3
patients identified	No, but have considered	6	21.4
	Yes, in progress	6	21.4
	Yes, nearly completed	3	10.7
	Yes, in place	2	7.1
	Total	28	100
There exist good	Strongly disagree	1	3.6
collaboration with IT staffs	Disagree	2	7.1
to implement DHIs	Neural	3	10.7
	Agree	9	32.1
	Strongly agree	13	46.5
	Total	28	100
Digital health interventions readiness
Legitimate reasons exist to	Strongly disagree	1	3.6
introduce computer-based	Disagree	3	10.7
system in the TB/HIV unit	Neutral	3	10.7
	Agree	10	35.7
	strongly Agree	11	39.3
	Total	28	100
Staff need new tools to	Disagree	1	3.6
improve the work	Neutral	1	3.6
	Agree	9	32.1
	Strongly agree	17	60.7
	Total	28	100
Staff in TB/HIV unit will	Disagree	2	7.1
benefit from DHIs	Neutral	1	3.6
	Agree	16	57.1
	Strongly agree	9	32.1
	Total	28	100
DHIs contribute to TB/HIV	Disagree	2	7.1
unit's performance	Agree	5	17.9
	Strongly agree	21	75
	Total	28	100
The facility is ready to	Strongly disagree	1	3.6
adopt and implement DHIs	Disagree	6	21.4
	Neutral	5	17.9
	Agree	9	32.1
	Strongly agree	7	25
	Total	28	100