Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;10(3):23259671221079338. doi: 10.1177/23259671221079338

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Similar Intra-Articular Diagnostic MRI Studies a

Diagnostic Performance of MRI
Lead Author (Year) Sample Size b Concomitant ACL Tear, n (%) b Age, y c Time From Injury to MRI, wk c Time From MRI to Surgery, wk c Any Meniscal Tear Medial Meniscal Tear Lateral Meniscal Tear
Present study 406 406 (100) 15.9 (10-18) 1.3 (0.0-4.0) 3.8 (0.1-8.0) Sn: 75.0%
Sp: 72.1%
Sn: 83.2%
Sp: 80.6%
Sn: 51.0%
Sp: 86.5%
Munger (2019) 35 107 107 (100) 15 (7-18) 2.4 (0.1-74.6) 5.4 (0.4-12.4) Sn: 62.3%
Sp: 68.4%
NR NR
Samora (2011) 40 69 69 (100) 14.1 (12.7-16.1) NR d NR d Sn: 58.7%
Sp: 91.3%
NR NR
Gans (2014) 16 178 54 (30.3) 13.9 NR 6.4 (0-46.3) NR Sn: 87.5%
Sp: 91.1%
Sn: 67.5%
Sp: 94.9%
Schub (2012) 42 119 47 (39.5) 16 (10-19) NR 6.6 (0.1-52.3) NR Sn: 81.0%
Sp: 90.9%
Sn: 68.8%
Sp: 93.0%
Luhmann (2005) 32 96 39 (40.6) 14.6 (7.3-18.7) 13 (2 wk-5 y) NR NR Sn: 94.4%
Sp: 91.0%
Sn: 88.9%
Sp: 87.0%
Kocher (2001) 27 118 32 (27.1) 12.6 NR NR NR Sn: 79.3%
Sp: 92.0%
Sn: 66.7%
Sp: 82.8%
Major (2003) 33 59 25 (42.4) 15 (11-17) NR NR NR Sn: 92.0%
Sp: 87.0%
Sn: 93.0%
Sp: 95.0%
Bouju (2011) 2 69 21 (30.4) 13.3 (9-16) 33 8.3 Sn: 70.0%
Sp: 81.0%
Sn: 75.0%
Sp: 77.0%
Sn: 78.0%
Sp: 69.0%

a ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NR, not reported; Sn, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.

b Presented in descending order by number of patients in study with concomitant ACL tear.

c Mean and range (if reported).

d Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing surgery within 3 months of injury.