Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 1;99(3):213–227. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001867

Table 2.

Distribution of Amblyopic-eye Visual Acuity Outcomes by Treatment Group at Baseline and Outcome Visits.

Baseline 4 weeksa 8 weeksa

Binocular Treatment Continued Spectacles Binocular Treatment Continued Spectacles Binocular Treatment Continued Spectacles

N % N % N % N % N % N %

Per Group (N) 92 90 85 84 85 84

Amblyopic-eye VA
 20/320 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 1%
 20/250 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
 20/200 1 1% 2 2% 1 1% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0%
 20/160 2 2% 3 3% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 4 5%
 20/125 7 8% 3 3% 3 4% 4 5% 5 6% 0 0%
 20/100 3 3% 4 4% 5 6% 1 1% 4 5% 1 1%
 20/80 9 10% 9 10% 9 11% 6 7% 8 9% 8 10%
 20/63 24 26% 24 27% 15 18% 20 24% 9 11% 13 15%
 20/50 27 29% 26 29% 9 11% 18 21% 11 13% 18 21%
 20/40 19 21% 19 21% 18 21% 15 18% 19 22% 17 20%
 20/32 0 0% 0 0% 15 18% 10 12% 14 16% 12 14%
 20/25 0 0% 0 0% 6 7% 5 6% 12 14% 7 8%
 20/20 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% 2 2% 1 1% 1 1%
 20/16 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1%
 20/12 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%
Mean (SD) logMAR 0.48 (0.16) 0.48 (0.17) 0.38 (0.22) 0.42 (0.21) 0.36 (0.22) 0.38 (0.22)

Mean IOD (SD) Lines 4.8 (1.7) 4.9 (1.7) 3.8 (2.3) 4.4 (2.2) 4.0 (2.2) 4.0 (2.3)

Change in amblyopic-eye VA from baseline
 ≥ 3 lines better 12 14% 6 7% 12 14% 9 11%
 2 lines better 19 22% 10 12% 23 27% 16 19%
 1 line better 22 26% 30 36% 29 34% 33 39%
 0 line 23 27% 25 30% 12 14% 13 15%
 1 line worse 7 8% 9 11% 8 9% 11 13%
 2 lines worse 2 2% 3 4% 1 1% 2 2%
 ≥ 3 lines worse 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0%
Mean (SD) Linesb 1.1 (1.4) 0.6 (1.3) 1.3 (1.4) 1.0 (1.4)
Adjusted mean (95% CI) at 4 weeksc 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 0.6 (0.3, 0.9)
Adjusted mean difference (95.1% CI) at 4 weeksc 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Adjusted mean (95% CI) at 8 weeksc 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) 1.0 (0.7, 1.3)
Adjusted mean difference (98.4% CI) at 8 weeksc 0.3 (−0.2, 0.8)

Improvement of ≥2 lines from baseline 31 36% 16 19% 35 41% 25 30%
Difference (98.4% CI)d 18% (1%, 34%) 12% (−6%, 29%)

Unmasked VA testing 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% 0 0%

CI = confidence interval; IOD = interocular difference; logMAR = logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; SD = standard deviation; VA = visual acuity.

a

Limited to follow-up visits completed within the pre-specified analysis windows.

b

Positive values indicate improvement in amblyopic-eye visual acuity from baseline.

c

Analysis of covariance model adjusting for baseline amblyopic-eye visual acuity was used to estimate the mean change in amblyopic-eye visual acuity within each treatment group as well as the treatment group difference (positive values favor the binocular treatment group) in the mean change in amblyopic-eye visual acuity from baseline to 4 weeks (P = .03) and to 8 weeks (Bonferroni-adjusted P = .60).

d

Binomial regression adjusting for baseline amblyopic-eye visual acuity was used to compare the proportion of participants with improvement of ≥2 lines in amblyopic-eye visual acuity from baseline to 4 weeks (Bonferroni-adjusted P = .03) and to 8 weeks (Bonferroni-adjusted P = .34) between the treatment groups. For the 3 exploratory visual acuity outcomes (which included the 8-week treatment group comparison of mean change in amblyopic-eye visual acuity), a Bonferroni adjustment was used to control for multiple testing to preserve the overall type I error rate at 4.9% (2-sided alpha=0.016 per test).