Table 3.
Relative abundance (%) of gut bacterial genera in low and high barley groups
| Low barley (n = 47) | High barley (n = 47) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–3.5 g/1000 kcal a | 3.5–28 g/1000 kcal a | |||
| Genus (relative abundance %) | Median (interquartile range) | Median (interquartile range) | P b (crude) | P c (FDR) |
| Bifidobacterium | 2.73 (0.00, 5.10) | 5.61 (0.00, 8.12) | 0.01 | 0.37 |
| Collinsella | 0.92 (0.00, 1.82) | 1.95 (0.00, 2.20) | 0.03 | 0.42 |
| Subdoligranulum | 1.12 (0.00, 1.80) | 1.83 (0.00, 2.32) | 0.08 | 0.44 |
| Anaerostipes | 0.89 (0.02, 1.28) | 1.06 (0.07, 1.92) | 0.0502 | 0.42 |
| Butyricicoccus | 0.43 (0.00, 0.46) | 0.65 (0.12, 0.65) | 0.002 | 0.09 |
| Ruminococcaceae UCG-013 | 0.09 (0.00, 0.27) | 0.22 (0.00, 0.34) | 0.06 | 0.44 |
| Dialister | 0.00 (0.00, 0.31) | 0.07 (0.00, 0.43) | 0.04 | 0.42 |
| Acidaminococcus | 0.00 (0.00, 0.30) | 0.03 (0.00, 0.66) | 0.07 | 0.44 |
| Ruminococcus 2 | 0.00 (0.00, 0.37) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.86) | 0.04 | 0.42 |
a Range of barley consumption rate
b Mann-Whitney U-test (crude P-value)
c Mann-Whitney U-test adjusted with the FDR (false discovery rate) method