Table 4.
Association between the intestinal bacteria and barley consumptiona by multivariate linear regression analyses
| Crude b | Model 1 c | Model 2 d | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | r (SE) | P | R (SE) | P | R (SE) | P |
| Bifidobacterium | 2.52 (0.70) | 0.012 | 2.52 (1.00) | 0.012 | 2.61 (1.03) | 0.012 |
| Butyricicoccus | 0.11 (0.05) | 0.03 | 0.11 (0.05) | 0.03 | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.102 |
| Collinsella | 0.23 (0.30) | 0.45 | 0.27 (0.30) | 0.38 | 0.26 (0.31) | 0.41 |
| Dialister | 0.08 (0.09) | 0.37 | 0.10 (0.09) | 0.24 | 0.08 (0.09) | 0.41 |
| Ruminococcus 2 | 0.10 (0.15) | 0.47 | 0.10 (0.15) | 0.53 | 0.11 (0.16) | 0.48 |
a The barley consumption group 0: low barley group (0–3.5 g/1000 kcal), 1: high barley group (3.5–28 g/1000 kcal)
b Crude [r (SE)]: Coefficients of a single linear regression model
c Model 1 [R (SE)]: Adjusted with sex, age, risk of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension
d Model 2 [R (SE)]: In addition to model 1, adjusted with an consumption of cereal, sugar and sweetener, legume, and beverage