Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;12:795258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.795258

Table 2.

Group classification performance between ataxia, controls (CTR) and parkinsonism.

N N % AUC Sens Spec
Ataxia vs. CTR 169, 58 0.75/0.25 0.92 (0.83–1.00) 0.89 (0.80–0.98) 0.81 (0.66–0.95)
Ataxia vs. parkinsonism 169, 74 0.66/0.33 0.91 (0.86–0.96) 0.94 (0.90–0.97) 0.72 (0.52–0.93)
parkinsonism vs. CTR 74, 58 0.66/0.33 0.68 (0.55–0.81) 0.69 (0.56–0.83) 0.64 (0.48–0.81)
Mild Ataxia vs. CTR 58, 58 0.50/0.50 0.76 (0.64–0.88) 0.70 (0.56–0.85) 0.83 (0.70–0.96)
Ataxia vs. CTR age <45 56, 45 0.55/0.45 0.93 (0.83–1.00) 0.88 (0.79–0.99) 0.85 (0.72–0.95)
Ataxia vs. parkinsonism age > 45 108, 73 0.60/0.40 0.84 (0.73–0.93) 0.79 (0.69–0.89 0.74 (0.66–0.95)

The columns indicate the number of participants per group (N), the group ratio (N %), receiving operant area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (Sens) and Specificity (Spec). For each measure the mean across cross-validation runs and the 95th confidence intervals are provided.