Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;16:844564. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.844564

TABLE 1.

Methods used for assessing the microbiome and outcomes of the studies discussed in this review (in alphabetical order).

First author Method Main findings in patients with functional dyspepsia compared to healthy subjects
Fukui et al., 2020 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: 341F, 805R Firmicutes ↑, Streptococcus
Igarashi et al., 2017 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: 341F, 806R Acidobacteria ↓, Bacteroidetes > Proteobacteria
Nakae et al., 2016 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: 516F, 1510R Bifidobacterium ↑, Prevotella
Qiu et al., 2017 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: 515F, 806R Bacteroidetes ↓, Cyanobacteria ↑, Firmicutes ↑, Proteobacteria
Vasapolli et al., 2021 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: not indicated no differences
Zhong et al., 2017 16S-rRNA sequencing, Primer: 917F, 1392R Actinomyces ↓, Prevotella ↓, Streptococcus ↑, Veillonella

↑, increased; ↓, decreased.