Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;49(5):58. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2022.5114

Table V.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of the overall survival rate of the ccRCC patients.

Parameters Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
χ2 P-value HR (95 CI) χ2 P-value HR (95 CI)
Sex
 Female vs. Male 0.48 0.486 0.52 (0.08-3.21)
Age (years)
 >62 vs. ≤62 1.99 0.157 0.32 (0.06-1.54)
Tumor size (cm)
 >7 vs. ≤7 1.08 0.297 2.62 (0.42-16.06)
Tumor stage
 T3+4 vs. T1+2 0.04 0.824 1.30 (2.64-585.07)
Histological ISUP grade
 3+4 vs. 1+2 7.11 0.007 39.37 (0.12-13.51) 10.94 <0.001 12.55 (2.80-56.18)
SHH mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 2.84 0.091 23.76 (0.59-945.48)
SMO mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 2.58 0.107 0.07 (0.01-1.76)
SUFU mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 0.10 0.747 2.04 (0.026-159.89)
GLI2 mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 0.15 0.698 0.47 (0.01-20.22)
GLI3 mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 0.17 0.675 0.49 (0.02-13.27)
GLI1 mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 1.24 0.265 8.10 (0.20-321.45)
PTCH1 mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 3.72 0.053 0.18 (0.03-1.02)
BCL2 mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 0.64 0.420 0.44 (0.06-3.16)
CCND1 mRNA levels
 ↓ vs. ↑ 3.93 0.047 12.63 (1.03-154.95) 0.07 0.781 1.14 (0.43-3.01)
MYC mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 0.01 0.901 1.29 (0.02-78.98)
VEGFA mRNA levels
 ↑ vs. ↓ 4.12 0.042 10.09 (1.08-93.97) 4.17 0.041 3.72 (1.05-13.17)

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; SHH, sonic hedgehog; SMO, smoothened; SUFU, suppressor of fused homolog; GLI1, 2, 3, glioma-associated zinc finger protein 1, 2, 3; PTCH1, patched 1; BCL2, BCL2 apoptosis regulator; CCND1, cyclin D1; MYC, MYC proto-oncogene; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A.