Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 7;2022:4261248. doi: 10.1155/2022/4261248

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of the en-masse retraction rate (mm/month) as well as the P values of significance tests.

Time FCG TCG FCG vs TCG mean difference (95% CI) P value
n Mean SD n Mean SD
Upper central incisors retraction rate
 T0-T1 18 1.60 0.14 18 1.82 0.18 −0.23 (−0.33, −0.12) <0.001
 T1-T2 18 1.42 0.10 18 1.66 0.15 −0.24 (−0.33, −0.16) <0.001
 T2-T3 18 1.22 0.10 18 1.39 0.18 −0.17 (−0.27, −0.07) 0.001
 T3-T4 15 1.08 0.08 15 1.14 0.18 −0.06 (−0.16, 0.04) 0.244
 T4-T5 9 0.98 0.12 6 0.89 0.11 0.09 (−0.04, 0.22) 0.148
 T0-TF 18 6.18 0.25 18 6.84 0.31 −0.65 (−0.84, −0.46) <0.001

Upper canine retraction rate
 T0-T1 18 1.57 0.19 18 1.80 0.18 −0.23 (−0.35, −0.10) <0.001
 T1-T2 18 1.41 0.10 18 1.63 0.15 −0.22 (−0.31, −0.14) <0.001
 T2-T3 18 1.21 0.10 18 1.38 0.18 −0.17 (−0.27, −0.08) 0.001
 T3-T4 15 1.07 0.09 15 1.09 0.22 −0.02 (−0.15, 0.11) 0.742
 T4-T5 9 0.98 0.12 6 0.86 0.14 0.11 (−0.03, 0.26) 0.115
 T0-TF 18 6.09 0.37 18 6.65 0.40 −0.55 (−0.82, −0.29) <0.001

Two-sample t-test. Employing Bonferroni's correction for multiplicity, statistical significance was set at P < 0.008 (alfa: 0.05/6 = 0.008); FCG: flapless corticotomy group; TCG: traditional corticotomy group; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; the TCG values were subtracted from the FCG values.