Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Sep 15;35(4):395–408. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1977797

Table 4.

Hypothesis C: Moderation of Anxiety-Depersonalization Relationship at State and Trait Levels

Trait Moderator β (SE) df t p 95% CI

State Level

Anxiety Sensitivity 0.03 (0.02) 601.00 1.48 .139 [−0.01, 0.06]
Distress Intolerance 0.02 (0.02) 601.00 0.92 .357 [−0.02, 0.05]
Negative Interpretation Bias for Anxiety Sensationsa 0.00 (0.02) 603.00 −0.23 .819 [−0.04, 0.03]
Negative Interpretation Bias for Depersonalization Sensationsa 0.00 (0.02) 603.00 0.16 .876 [−0.03, 0.04]

Trait Level

Anxiety Sensitivity 0.25 (0.04) 298 5.70 <.001*** [0.17, 0.34]
Distress Intolerance 0.15 (0.05) 298 2.92 .004** [0.05, 0.25]
Negative Interpretation Bias for Anxiety Sensationsa −0.21 (0.04) 298 −4.79 <.001*** [−0.30, −0.13]
Negative Interpretation Bias for Depersonalization Sensationsa −0.27 (0.04) 298 −6.54 <.001*** [−0.35, −0.19]

Note. Effects on state depersonalization were estimated with mixed-effects models. Effects on trait depersonalization were estimated with multiple linear regression models.

a

Negative Interpretation Bias for Anxiety Sensations and Negative Interpretation Bias for Depersonalization Sensations were inverse-transformed to meet model assumptions. Therefore, negative values for β suggest positive effects of Trait Anxiety × Negative Interpretation Bias for Anxiety Sensations and Trait Anxiety × Negative Interpretation Bias for Depersonalization Sensations on Trait Depersonalization.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.