Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Sep 15;34(5):1901–1913. doi: 10.1017/S0954579421000468

Table 2.

Parameter estimates, standard errors, and fit indices for Latent Growth Curve (LGC) Models for children’s internalizing behaviors with neural synchrony during Frustration and Play as predictors.

LGC with no predictors LGC with Neural Synchrony
during Frustration as predictor
LGC with Neural Synchrony
during Play as predictor
B SE p B SE p B SE p
Means
 Intercept 6.487 .424 <.001 6.137 .510 <.001 6.444 .514 <.001
 Slope −.280 .135 .038 −.123 .164 .455 −.344 .163 .035
Variances
 Intercept 22.432 3.408 <.001 19.797 3.590 <.001 19.989 3.607 <.001
 Slope 1.428 .508 .005 1.543 .528 .003 1.481 .517 .004
Covariance −2.582 1.045 .013 −1.775 1.035 .086 −1.821 1.025 .076
Predictor on
 Intercept .394 .425 .354 −.218 .449 .628
 Slope −.126 .137 .357 .317 .143 .027
Fit Indices
χ2 4.839 2.327 2.715
 df 5 7 7
 CFI 1.00 1.00 1.00
 TLI 1.00 1.00 1.00
 RMSEA .000 .000 .000
 SRMR .031 .016 .019

Note. B = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error; Bold = p < .05.