Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;61(3):1649–1663. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02728-4

Table 4.

The assessment of inadequacy of micronutrient intakes separate for users and non-users of fortified fats

Micronutrient Age (year) Gender AI EAR Non-users Users
Evaluation risk inadequate intake for each age (in years) % < EAR Evaluation risk inadequate intake % < EARa

Vitamin A

(µg RAE)

1–17 Boys

300/350/400/

600b

600c

1–9: LR

10–13: NSP

55.7 (48.5–59.7)

1–9, 12–13: LR

10–11: NSP

40.9 (35.1–46.5)
Girls 500c

1–9: LR

10–13: NSP

48.4 (42.2–56.7)

1–9: LR

10–13: NSP

50.1 (44.5–55.1)
18–79 Men 615 31.9 (27.0–36.6) 26.8 (22.9–30.6)
Women 525 25.5 (18.4–34.4) 34.4 (30.9–38.6)
Vitamin B1 (mg) 1–17 Boys 0.3/0.5/0.8/1.1

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

1–13, 15–17: LR

14: NSP

Girls

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

18–79 Men 0.072 1.2 (1.2–1.2) 1.3 (1.3–1.4)
Women 0.9 (0.9–0.9) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
Vitamin B2 (mg) 1–17 Boys 0.5/0.7/1/1.5

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

LR
Girls 0.5/0.7/1/1.1

1–8, 10–11, 13: LR

9, 12, 14–17: NSP

LR
18–79 Men 1.3 33.4 (30.0–38.8) 10.6 (6.9–13.9)
Women 64.3 (61.1–67.5) 40.0 (34.8–45.2)
Vitamin B3 (mg) 1–17 Boys 4/7/11/17

1–13, 17: LR

14–16: NSP

1–13, 15– 17: LR

14: NSP

Girls 4/7/11/13

1–8, 12–13: LR

9–11, 14–17: NSP

1–13, 15–17: LR

14: NSP

18–79 Men 1.3 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
Women 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0)
Vitamin B6 (mg) 1–17 Boys 0.4/0.7/1.1/1.5

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

LR
Girls

1–8: LR

9–17: NSP

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

18–79 Men 1.1 11.6 (7.3–17.8) 5.8 (5.1–8.6)
Women 26.2 (21.1–35.1) 20.3 (16.9–24.1)
Folate equivalents (µg) 1–17 Boys 85/150/225/300

1–3, 6–8: LR

4–5, 9–17: NSP

1–13: LR

14–17: NSP

Girls

1–3, 6–8: LR

4–5, 9–17: NSP

1–8: LR

9–17: NSP

18–79 Men 200 17 (14.3–19.8) 0.5 (0.0–1.2)
Women 40.5 (37.2–44.6) 7.3 (3.6–13.1)
Vitamin B12 (µg) 1–17 Boys 0.7/1.3/2/2.8 LR LR
Girls

1–13, 16–17: LR

14–15: NSP

LR
18–79 Men 2 1.6 (0.9–2.5) 1.6 (0.3–4.0)
Women 6.4 (4.8–8.6) 4.3 (2.1–6.5)
Vitamin C (mg) 1–17 Boys 25/30/40/50b 60c LR 39.2 (35.2–46.2) LR 8.0 (5.1–10.7)
Girls 50c LR 29.9 (26.6–35.2) LR 6.5 (3.5–8.8)
18–79 Men 60 23.8 (21.7–28.8) 6.1 (3.8–8.4)
Women 50 20.2 (17.2–23.6) 3.0 (1.6–4.6)
Vitamin D (µg) 1–17 Boys 10/3d

NSP/

1: LR

2–17: NSP5

NSP/

LR5

Girls

NSP/

NSP5

NSP/

NSP5

18–79 Men 10/3d 10

NSP/

26–69:LR

18–25: NSP5

99.4 (98.5–99.9)

NSP/

LR5

98.6 (96–100.5)
Women

NSP/

NSP5

100 (99.9–100.0)

NSP/

18, 26–27, 31–69: LR

19–25, 28–30: NSP5

99.2 (96.4–100.2)
Vitamin E (mg) 1–17 Boys 4/5/6/8b 6c LR 5.5 (2.5–8.4) LR 0.6 (0.6–1.1)
Girls 4/5/6/7b 5c LR 6 (3.0–8.0) LR 1.3 (1.3–2.1)
18–79 Men 13

25–58: LR

18–24, 59–79: NSP

18–72, 74: LR

73, 75–79: NSP

Women 11 NSP

37, 39–41, 43–45, 47–48, 50–51, 54–78: LR

18–36, 38, 42, 46, 49, 52–53, 79: NSP

Iron (mg) 1–17 Boys 8/9/11b 7c NSP 12.5 (9.3–15.2)

4–9: LR

1–3, 10–13: NSP

2.9 (0.0–5.2)
Girls 10c NSP 89.4 (86.6–92.0)

5: LR

1–4, 6–13: NSP

71.0 (65.6–77.9)
18–79 Men 6 0.6 (0.3–0.9) 0.1 (0.0–0.2)
Women 7/6 9.4 (9.3–13.3) 7.2 (2.9–11.2)
Calcium (mg) 1–17 Boys 500/700/1200

1–8: LR

9–17: NSP

1–8: LR

9–17: NSP

Girls 500/700/1100

1–3: LR

4–17: NSP

1–3, 5–8: LR

4, 9–17: NSP

18–79 Men 1200e

860/

750f

NSP

18–24: 41.0 (40.2–45.3)

25–69: 17.9 (18.1–23.3)g

NSP

18–24: 27.1 (29.3–37.0)h

25–69: 11.0 (10.1–16.0)

Women 1100/1200e NSP

18–24: 64.4 (61.2–67.6)

25–49: 32.4 (29.6–42.9)

NSP

18–24: 48.7 (44.2–56.1)

25–49: 22.0 (16.1–28.0)

LR low risk, NSP no statement possible

aStatistical significant lower proportion of users below the EAR compared to non-users is indicated when valued are displayed bold

bThe AI accounts only for children 1–13 years old

cThe EAR for children accounts only for children 14–17 years old

dTwo AI-values for vitamin D, where 3 µg/day indicates adequate vitamin D intake with enough sun exposure and 10 µg/day if this amount of sun exposure is not met

eAI for men 70–79 and women 50–79 years old

fEAR = 860 for adults aged 18–24 year. EAR = 750 for women 25–50 year old and men 25–70 year old

gEstimation falls outside of 95%CI due to extreme values (n=5; 0.5% of all observations within this subgroup)

hEstimation falls outside of 95%CI due to an extreme value (n=1; 1.5% of all observations within this subgroup)