Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 14;5:230. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03173-7

Fig. 6. Memory ability was correlated with prosocial strategy use but not coercive strategy use.

Fig. 6

a The correlation between dominance level and resource control (Pearson correlation, n = 175). b The correlation between dominance level and prosocial strategy (Pearson correlation, n = 175). c The correlation between dominance level and coercive strategy (Pearson correlation, n = 175). d The correlation between memory score and resource control (Pearson correlation, n = 175). e The correlation between memory score and prosocial strategy (Pearson correlation, n = 175). f The correlation between memory score and coercive strategy (Pearson correlation, n = 175). g The mediated model linking children’s memory ability and children’s social dominance (regression analysis, n = 175).