Table 1.

Relationship between glucose-induced benefit and baseline performance/BMI.

	Baseline performance			BMI
	Pearson’s r	p value	FDR	Pearson’s r	p value	FDR
Corsi-Block-Tapping Task	−0.57	<0.001***	<0.001	−0.17	0.169	0.276
Women only	−0.64	<0.001***	<0.001	−0.17	0.261	0.357
Men only	−0.34	0.112	0.202	−0.18	0.405	0.455
Go-No-Go Task	0.39	0.001**	0.002	0.13	0.290	0.357
Women only	0.51	<0.001***	0.001	0.26	0.076	0.152
Men only	0.25	0.245	0.357	0.04	0.856	0.857
Word list recall	−0.50	<0.001***	<0.001	0.02	0.857	0.857
Women only	−0.52	<0.001***	0.001	−0.15	0.297	0.357
Men only	−0.55	0.006**	0.015	0.49	0.017*	0.037

Go-No-Go Task performance was expressed as response time. Thus, the corresponding correlation coefficients’ algebraic signs need to be interpreted in reverse. The total sample size was 71 (48 women, 23 men). Correlations were computed one-tailed. False discovery rate (FDR) is given for each tested hypothesis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.