Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;12:818860. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.818860

Table 2.

Comparison of TCGA training and testing cohort.

Characteristics TCGA Testing Cohort N = 107 TCGA Training Cohort N = 252 p-Value
Age 0.5587
<=65 45 (42.06%) 96 (38.1%)
>65 62 (57.94%) 156 (61.9%)
Gender 0.1973
Female 35 (32.71%) 64 (25.4%)
Male 72 (67.29%) 188 (74.6%)
Grade 1
High 103 (96.26%) 239 (94.84%)
Low 4 (3.74%) 10 (3.97%)
Unknow 0 (0%) 3 (1.19%)
Stage 0.5564
I-II 31 (28.97%) 82 (32.54%)
III-IV 76 (71.03%) 168 (66.67%)
Unknow 0 (0%) 2 (0.79%)
T 0.806
T0-T2 30 (28.04%) 77 (30.56%)
T3-T4 67 (62.62%) 156 (61.9%)
Unknow 10 (9.35%) 19 (7.54%)
M 1
M0 46 (42.99%) 118 (46.83%)
M1 3 (2.8%) 8 (3.17%)
Unknow 58 (54.21%) 126 (50%)
N 0.254
N0-N1 79 (73.83%) 172 (68.25%)
N2-N3 17 (15.89%) 55 (21.83%)
Unknow 11 (10.28%) 25 (9.92%)
Neoadjuvant therapy 0.7362
Yes 2 (1.87%) 8 (3.17%)
No 105 (98.13%) 244 (96.83%)
Radiotherapy 0.9045
Yes 4 (3.74%) 11 (4.37%)
No 77 (71.96%) 166 (65.87%)
Unknow 26 (24.3%) 75 (29.76%)