Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;32(3):288–296. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002473

Table 1.

Summary of patient and treatment characteristics, and treatment outcomes of the included randomized controlled trials. Outcome data are expressed at 5 years, unless indicated differently

Author (year of publication) Years of inclusion No of patients Mono/multi center Treatment arms Median FU (months) Age (years) FIGO stage (n (%)) HT device HT temp (median °C) Outcome
I II III IV LC/PC DFS OS
Harima (2001)42 1994–1999 40 Mono RT vs RHT 36 62 vs 65 0 (0) 0 (0) 40 (100) 0 (0) Capacitive 40.6 10 vs 16* 10 vs 16* 48 vs 58*
Van der Zee (2002)35 1990–1996 114 Multi RT vs RHT 43 56 vs 58 0 (0) 22 (19) 81 (71) 11 (10) Radiative NA 41 vs 61* NA 27 vs 51*
Vasanathan (2005) 1998–2002 110 Multi RT vs RHT 16 50 vs 45 0 (0) 56 (51) 51 (46) 3 (3) Capacitive 41.6 69* NA 73*
Lutgens (2016)37 2003–2009 84 Multi CRT vs RHT 85 53 18 (21) 46 (55) 18 (21) 2 (3) Radiative NA NA 1.15† 1.04†
Harima (2016)38 2001–2015 101 Multi CRT vs RCHT 55 62 vs 60 1 (1) 26 (26) 66 (65) 8 (8) Capacitive 41.1 71 vs 80 61 vs 71 65 vs 78
Minnaar (2019)34 2014–2017 202 Mono CRT vs RCHT 6 49 vs 48 0 (0) 75 (36) 2 (1) 129 (63) Capacitive NA 20 vs 39‡ 20 vs 39‡ 82 vs 87‡
Wang (2020)39 2009–2013 373 Mono CRT vs RCHT 60 50 vs 51 7 (2) 230 (62) 127 (34) 9 (2) Capacitive 40.5 NA 83 vs 87 72 vs 82

Bold type indicates significant difference.

*Based on 3 years of follow-up.

†Based on 7 years of follow-up.

‡Based on 6 months of follow-up.

CRT, chemoradiation; DFS, disease free survival; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obsetrics 2008; FU, follow-up; HT, hyperthermia; LC, local control; NA, not available; OS, overall survival; PC, pelvic control; RCHT, chemoradiation with hyperthermia; RHT, radiotherapy and hyperthermia; RT, radiotherapy.