TABLE 3.
Anthropometry at 12 and 24 wk post enrollment1
12 wk post enrollment | 24 wk post enrollment | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention (n = 545) | Control (n = 665) | Mean difference2 | P value | Intervention (n = 534) | Control (n = 661) | Mean difference2 | P value | |
MUAC, cm | 12.51 ± 0.81 | 12.42 ± 0.88 | 0.08 (−0.02, 0.18) | 0.11 | 12.72 ± 0.98 | 12.63 ± 1.00 | 0.09 (−0.03, 0.21) | 0.14 |
WAZ | −2.60 ± 0.91 | −2.68 ± 0.98 | 0.09 (−0.02, 0.19) | 0.10 | −2.55 ± 1.01 | −2.64 ± 1.00 | 0.10 (−0.02, 0.21) | 0.09 |
LAZ | −2.96 ± 1.11 | −2.98 ± 1.20 | 0.04 (−0.08, 0.16) | 0.56 | −3.01 ± 1.11 | −2.99 ± 1.20 | −0.01 (−0.14, 0.12) | 0.93 |
WLZ | −1.42 ± 0.89 | −1.52 ± 0.94 | 0.10 (−0.02, 0.22) | 0.10 | −1.37 ± 0.99 | −1.50 ± 0.97 | 0.14 (0.02, 0.26) | 0.02 |
Subscapular skinfold-for-age z | −0.60 ± 1.29 | −0.65 ± 1.45 | 0.05 (−0.11, 0.21) | 0.51 | −0.30 ± 1.37 | −0.39 ± 1.47 | 0.10 (−0.08, 0.28) | 0.28 |
Triceps skinfold-for-age z | −0.76 ± 1.12 | −0.78 ± 1.19 | 0.02 (−0.11, 0.16) | 0.73 | −0.47 ± 1.22 | −0.51 ± 1.21 | 0.04 (−0.10, 0.19) | 0.55 |
Skinfold thickness ratio3 | 1.21 ± 0.23 | 1.21 ± 0.22 | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.02) | 0.77 | 1.22 ± 0.24 | 1.23 ± 0.23 | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.02) | 0.87 |
Change in MUAC, cm | 0.57 ± 0.77 | 0.45 ± 0.86 | 0.12 (0.03, 0.21) | 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.95 | 0.66 ± 0.99 | 0.13 (0.02, 0.24) | 0.03 |
Weight gain, g · kg−1 · d−1 | 1.24 ± 0.95 | 1.10 ± 1.05 | 0.15 (0.03, 0.26) | 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.67 | 0.97 ± 0.64 | 0.11 (0.03, 0.18) | 0.01 |
1Values are means ± SDs or means (95% CIs) unless otherwise indicated. Outcomes were compared using linear regression analysis. LAZ, length-for-age z score; MUAC, midupper arm circumference; WAZ, weight-for-age z score; WLZ, weight-for-length z score.
2Mean difference adjusted for age and sex, and model accounted for clustering by clinic site.
3Ratio is subscapular:triceps.