Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;9(8):2104347. doi: 10.1002/advs.202104347

Table 2.

Comparison of soft grippers of their performance (FE: fluidic elastomer; DE: dielectric elastomer; IPMC: ionic polymer‐metal composites; SMA: shape memory alloy; PG: pneumatic gripper; SMP: shape memory polymer; LCE: liquid crystal elastomer)

Category (By materials) Lifting ratio (Object mass/gripper mass) Gripper size [10−2 m] Response time [s]
FE 2[ 193 ]–68[ 194 ] 0.5[ 195 ]–120[ 196 ] 0.1[ 197 ]
DE 5.5[ 198 ]–100.8[ 199 ] 2[ 200 ]–10.3[ 201 ] 0.1[ 201 ]
IPMC 2[ 202 ]–3.5[ 203 ] 0.5[ 203 ]–8[ 204 ] 0.33[ 205 ]
SMA 15[ 206 ]–25.8[ 207 ] 0.9[ 208 ]–11.5[ 209 ] 0.15[ 206 ]
PG 13[ 210 ]–38.3[ 211 ] 0.5[ 195 , 212 ]–148[ 213 ] 0.1[ 197 ]
SMP 48.9[ 214 ] 0.4[ 215 ]–6[ 216 ] 10[ 217 ]
LCE 210[ 218 ] 0.03[ 219 ]–3[ 220 ] 0.2[ 221 ]