Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 2;250:118962. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118962

Table 1.

Percentage (± standard error) of electrodes showing significant similarity between neural data and the produced speech audio or stimulus audio, as established by the coherence method and the Roussel et al.’s (2020) method. The coherence method was run independently for the baseline, listening and speech production epochs. The Roussel et al.’s method used the entire duration of the session. Hierarchical bootstrapping was used to estimate the standard error.

Audio Produced speech audio
Stimulus audio
Method
Epoch
Coherence
baseline
listening speech Roussel
all
Coherence
baseline
listening speech Roussel
all
ECoG 0.2±0.1% 0.2±0.1% 52±6% 54±5% 0.4±0.3% 0.2±0.1% 1.4±0.7% 2.2±0.5%
Macro 0% 0% 42±8% 25±5% 0% 0% 0% 4±2%
Micro 0% 0% 56±7% 96±7% 0% 0% 0% 0.6±0.8%
DBS Lead 0% 0% 47±10% 59±10% 6±6% 7±6% 10±8% 12±8%
Blank 10±4% 12±5% 65±8% 71±6% 2±2% 15±8 3±2% 12±7%

Coherence indices are independent of anatomic location.