Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 28;9:754329. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.754329

Table 3.

Comparison of physical performance indices according to edema index tertile.

Low tertile Middle tertile High tertile P-value
Univariate
HGS 29.4 ± 9.3 26.0 ± 5.5 23.1 ± 5.8a 0.005
Gait speed 0.99 ± 0.17 0.96 ± 0.15 0.81 ± 0.22a,b 0.001
SPPB 11.6 ± 0.9 11.4 ± 0.9 9.7 ± 2.1a,b <0.001
STS5 7.2 ± 2.1 8.2 ± 2.4 11.1 ± 9.7a 0.046
STS30 20.7 ± 6.0 17.9 ± 4.7 15.2 ± 5.2a 0.001
6-MWT 505.4 ± 87.7 482.2 ± 92.7 394.1 ± 124.6a,b <0.001
TUG 6.3 ± 1.6 7.1 ± 1.6 8.5 ± 2.2a,b <0.001
Average steps 5,882 ± 2,659 5,073 ± 3,509 3,862 ± 3,815 0.097
Multivariate
HGS 28.6 ± 1.2 26.6 ± 1.0 23.2 ± 1.1a,b 0.005
Gait speed 0.96 ± 0.04 0.97 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.03a,b 0.002
SPPB 11.3 ± 0.3 11.5 ± 0.3 9.9 ± 0.3a,b <0.001
STS5 8.0 ± 1.3 8.0 ± 1.1 10.5 ± 1.2 0.227
STS30 20.0 ± 1.1 18.2 ± 1.0 15.5 ± 1.0a,b 0.018
6-MWT 478.0 ± 20.0 491.7 ± 17.5 409.1 ± 18.2a,b 0.004
TUG 6.8 ± 0.4 6.9 ± 0.3 8.3 ± 0.3a,b 0.005
Average steps 5,939 ± 757 5,040 ± 646 3,845 ± 683 0.149

Data are expressed as mean ± SD for univariate analysis and the mean ± SE for multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc Tukey comparison, and multivariate analysis was performed using analysis of covariance and adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes mellitus.

a

P < 0.05 compared with low tertile.

b

P < 0.05 compared with middle tertile.

HGS, handgrip strength; SPPB, short physical performance battery; STS5, five times sit-to-stand test; STS30, sit-to-stand for 30-s test; 6-MWT, 6-min walk test; TUG, timed up-to-go test.