Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;8(3):612–625. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00643

Table 1. Cryo-EM Data Collection, Refinement, and Validation Statistics.

data collection and processing   model comparison  
magnification ×105 000 nonhydrogen atoms 8990
voltage (kV) 300 protein residues 1070
electron exposure e-2 54 B factors (Å2)  
defocus range (μm) 0.8–2.0 protein 21–306
pixel size (Å) 0.859 r.m.s deviations  
symmetry imposed C1 bond lengths (Å2) 0.0126
initial particle images (no) 2000000 bond angles (°) 1.1569
final particle images (no) 196709 validation  
map resolution (Å) 2.8 MolProbity score 1.47
FSC threshold 0.143 clashscore 4.22
map resolution range (Å) 2.8 to > 5.5 poor rotamers (%) 1.28
refinement   Ramachandran plot  
initial model used 5LEW favored (%) 96.90
model resolution (Å) 2.9 allowed (%) 3.10
FSC threshold 0.143 disallowed (%) 0
map sharpening B-factor (Å2) –50