Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;12:805290. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.805290

Table 2.

Analysis of RAI2 expression status with OS or RFS in colorectal cancer patients by Cox regression analysis.

Variables OS RFS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI) P HR(95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P HR(95%CI) P
RAI2 expression 0.644 0.010* 0.683 0.027* 0.645 0.011* 0.671 0.022*
high vs low (0.462-0.898) (0.488-0.957) (0.460-0.904) (0.477-0.945)
Age (year) 0.619 0.005** 0.560 0.001** 0.853 0.348 0.780 0.158
>60 vs 60 (0.444-0.863) (0.397-0.789) (0.612-1.189) (0.553-1.101)
Gender 1.021 0.900 0.950 0.764 1.010 0.953 0.950 0.767
Female vs Male (0.735-1.420) (0.678-1.331) (0.724-1.409) (0.675-1.337)
Tumor location 1.026 0.900 1.174 0.467 1.034 0.872 1.250 0.322
distal colon or rectum vs proximal colon (0.686-1.535) (0.762-1.810) (0.687-1.556) (0.804-1.943)
Tumor size 0.808 0.268 0.729 0.118 0.796 0.244 0.727 0.120
≤5 cm vs >5 cm (0.554-1.178) (0.490-1.083) (0.543-1.168) (0.486-1.087)
Differentiation 1.055 0.765 1.091 0.630 0.998 0.990 1.038 0.839
Low vs High/middle (0.744-1.495) (0.766-1.553) (0.700-1.423) (0.725-1.486)
TNM-stage 2.182 0.000*** 2.439 0.000*** 2.067 0.000*** 2.237 0.000***
III/IV vs I/II (1.558-3.055) (1.708-3.483) (1.464-2.918) (1.550-3.228)
Pathologic N stage 0.996 0.989 1.213 0.541 1.003 0.992 1.239 0.500
N1-2 vs N0 (0.538-1.843) (0.653-2.253) (0.542-1.856) (0.665-2.311)
Intravascular cancerous embolus 1.302 0.255 1.061 0.805 1.044 0.863 0.884 0.633
Yes vs No (0.827-2.051) (0.665-1.693) (0.637-1.713) (0.533-1.467)

*P <0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.