Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;106(3):841–845. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0970

Table 4.

Performance characteristics of mn-PCR, LM, and LAMP by malaria case in comparison to the gold standard (nPCR) in Sistan-Baluchestan, Iran

Test Sensitivity% (95% CI) Specificity% (95% CI) PPV% (95% CI) NPV% (95% CI) Agreement between tests, kappa
All positive by nPCR vs. all positive by LM 92.31 (81.46–97.86) 81.13 (68.03–90.56) 82.76 (73.20–89.40) 91.49 (80.6–96.53) 0.734
All positive by nPCR vs. all positive by mn-PCR 100 (92.45–100) 100 (91.59–100) 100 (0.9–100) 100 (0.89–100) 1
All positive by nPCR vs. all positive by LAMP 92.06 (82.44–97.37) 100 (91.59–100) 100 (0.92–100) 89.36 (78.37–95.12) 0.903

CI = confidence interval; LAMP = loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LM = light microscopy; mn-PCR = multiplex/nested polymerase chain reaction; nPCR = nested polymerase chain reaction; NPV = negative predictive value PPV = positive predictive value.