Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of disease characteristics and their relationship with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in chronic TMD patients
| PSQI | Poor sleepers (PSQI > 5) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Subgroup n (%) | PSQI global score | p-valuea | Poor sleeper n (%) | p-valueb |
| Demographics of TMD patients (n = 503) | |||||
| Age groups | |||||
| Under 20 years old (10s) | 61 (12.1) | 4.69 ± 2.34 | < 0.001*** | 20/61 (32.8) | < 0.001*** |
| 20–30 years old (20s) | 208 (41.4) | 5.85 ± 2.45 | 10s < 20s = 30s = over 40c | 104/208 (50.0) | |
| 31–40 years old (30s) | 93 (18.5) | 6.87 ± 2.91 | 20s < 30s = over 40d | 61/93 (65.6) | |
| More than 40 years old (over 40) | 141 (28.0) | 7.11 ± 2.90 | 101/141 (71.6) | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 170 (33.8) | 5.65 ± 2.64 | < 0.001*** | 77/170 (45.3) | < 0.001*** |
| Female | 333 (66.2) | 6.56 ± 2.79 | 209/333 (62.8) | ||
| TMD Axis I diagnosis in TMD patients(Multiple diagnoses are allowed per patient) | |||||
| Myofascial pain | |||||
| [presence] | 465 (92.4) | 6.31 ± 2.82 | 0.023* | 268/465 (57.6) | 0.145 |
| [absence] | 38 (7.6) | 5.50 ± 1.98 | 18/38 (47.4) | ||
| Disc displacement | |||||
| [presence] | 278 (55.3) | 6.27 ± 2.77 | 0.862 | 159/278 (57.2) | 0.928 |
| [absence] | 225 (44.7) | 6.23 ± 2.78 | 127/225 (56.4) | ||
| Arthralgia | |||||
| [presence] | 355 (70.6) | 6.22 ± 2.88 | 0.888 | 203/355 (57.2) | 0.448 |
| [absence] | 148 (29.4) | 6.26 ± 2.72 | 83/148 (56.1) | ||
| Headache attributed to TMD | |||||
| [presence] | 285 (56.7) | 6.58 ± 2.85 | 0.002** | 178/285 (62.5) | 0.005** |
| [absence] | 218 (43.3) | 5.82 ± 2.60 | 108/218 (49.5) | ||
TMD temporomandibular disorder, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SD standard deviation
p-Value significance was set at < 0.05. *: p-value < 0.05, **: p-value < 0.01, ***: p-value < 0.001
a: The p-value for the test of the mean difference of the PSQI global score between subgroups. b: The p-value for the comparison results of the number (%) between subgroups via χ2 test and Boneferroni correction. The mean difference among age subgroups was obtained by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analysis. c: The PSQI global scores of subgroups over 20 years of age were significantly higher than that of 10s, and the scores of 20s, 30s, and over 40 were not significantly different. d: The PSQI global scores over 30 years of age were significantly higher than that of 20s, and the scores of 30s and over 40 were not significantly different