Table 1.
Paper | Images | Features | Result | Inference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ng et al. [60] | CT and Chest X-Ray (CXR) images from 21 cases | Patchy bilateral GGO with peribronchial and peripheral/subpleural distribution | CXR lack sensitivity than CT | Asymptomatic |
Zu et al. [101] | CT | Peripherally distributed multifocal GGOs with patchy consolidations and posterior part or lower lobe involvement predilection | CT outperforms RT-PCR | ------ |
Wang et al. [87] | 366 chest CT images from 90 patients | GGO, consolidation, reticular pattern, mixed pattern, honeycomb pattern,pleura effusion, pneumothorax and mediastinal emphysema | CT sensitivities increases from 84% to 99%. | ------ |
Bernheim et al. [13] | 121 Chest CT images | GGO, consolidation, affected number & degree of lobes, pulmonary nodules, pleural effusion, thoracic lymphadenopathy, airways abnormalities, axial distribution, emphysema or fibrosis, lung cavitation, linear opacities, rounded morphology, ‘reverse halo’ sign, ‘crazy-paving’ pattern and intralesional cavitation. | RT-PCR is positive even in patients with normal chest CT | ------ |
Ai et al. [3] | chest CT images of 1014 patients | GGO, consolidation, reticulation/thickened interlobular septa, nodules and lesion distribution in left, right or bilateral lungs | RT-PCR CI of 95%, sensitivity 97% | ------ |
Bai et al. [10] | Chest CT images of 424 patients |
Peripheral distribution, GGO, fine reticular opacity, and vascular thickening Less likely features: central distribution, pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy |
High specificity but moderate sensitivity | Small cohort size, biased. |
Caruso et al. [14] | Chest CT images of 158 patients | GGO, consolidation, multilobe involvement, bilateral distribution, pulmonary nodules, interlobular septal thickening, air bronchogram, halo sign, cavitation, bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, perilesional vessel diameter, lymphadenopathy,pleural and pericardial effusion. | Sensitivity 97% | ------ |