Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD006372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006372.pub2

Comparison 1. Direct voice training versus no intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Any voice handicap 3   Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Post‐intervention 3 110 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.27 [‐0.12, 0.66]
1.2 Follow up 1 24 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [‐0.44, 1.20]
2 Amount of vocal misuse behaviours 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Post‐intervention 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 64.73 [‐65.48, 194.94]
2.2 Follow up 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 53.99 [‐73.58, 181.56]
3 Normalised maximum phonation time (seconds) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Post‐intervention 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.32 [‐0.53, 7.17]
3.2 Follow up 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.17 [0.24, 6.10]
4 Maximum phonational frequency range 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Post‐intervention 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.05 [‐4.59, 4.49]
4.2 Follow up 1 24 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.03 [‐5.04, 2.98]