Table 2.
Name of systems | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Three-dimensional simulation system of flood routing |
Diversified information presentation; Good user interface; Simple operation |
Unreliable simulation process | Yuan et al. (2002) |
Novel flood hazard warning system |
Dynamic display; Real-time prediction |
None noted | Wang et al. (2016) |
Sponge city flood simulation and forecasting system | Good output expressiveness | Poor integration of different requirements visualization | Wang et al. (2019b) |
GIS-based 3D visual simulation system for flood protecting | Good combination of information | None noted | Huang et al. (2006) |
VE-based real-time interactive simulation framework | Faster system operation |
More difficult and complex real-time simulation; Difficult operation changeability |
Zhang et al. (2013) |
Dynamic visual simulation and decision support system for flood risk management | Reduce decision time |
Few types of models; Low operating efficiency |
Wu et al. (2019) |
Integrated virtual geographic environmental simulation framework | Break the static data-driven bottleneck | Cannot connect to information infrastructure | Ding et al. (2014) |