Skip to main content
letter
. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):40. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00641-5

Fig. 1. CH in ITP, AA, and hMDS patients.

Fig. 1

A Age profile of patients with ITP, AA, and MDS. B The prevalence of CH in ITP was much lower than that in AA and hMDS. C The VAF value of mutations in ITP patients was much lower than that in AA and hMDS. D Mutation number distribution in all CH patients. E The gender ratio of patients with ITP, AA, and hMDS. F The prevalence of CH in ITP patients over 65 years old was higher than that under 65 years old (27.27% vs. 6.25%, P = 0.005). The polyline represents the cumulative prevalence of CH in ITP patients, the bars show the percentage of patients with CH in different age groups. G No statistically significant correlation was found between mutation VAF and age in ITP patients. H The prevalence of different genes in ITP patients with CH or with low-burden mutations. I The top six most frequently mutated genes in AA patients with CH. J The top six most frequently mutated genes in hMDS patients with CH. K The percentages of different mutation types in all mutations. L There was no statistical difference in the platelet count between CH and non-CH-ITP patients (9.82 ± 7.77 vs. 18.07 ± 16.04, P = 0.097). M Severe bleeding cases occurred in 36.4% CH-ITP patients and 8.8% non-CH-ITP patients. The platelet count and patient age were included in the confounders in the analysis. N The initial response rate in patients with CH was lower compared with patients without CH though it did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of refractory cases in patients with CH was much higher than that in non-CH patients. All data analyzed by t test were normally distributed and similar in variance. CH clonal hematopoiesis, VAF variant allele frequency, del deletion, dup duplication, ins insertion, delins deletion-insertion.