Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;14:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100234

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Biocompatibility evaluation of the GelMA hydrogel and AOM scaffold. (A1-A6) Gross observations of the GelMA group after cell loading at 1, 4, and 7 days. (B1–B6) SEM images of the GelMA group at the above time points. (C1–C6) Live & Dead cell staining of the GelMA group at the above time points. (D1-D6) Gross observations of the Control group at the above time points. (E1-E6) SEM images of the Control group at the above time points. (F1–F6) Live & Dead cell staining of the Control group at the above time points. The quantitative analyses of (G) cell seeding efficiency and (H) DNA content in the GelMA and Control groups. (I) Cytotoxicity test for the AOM scaffold. (n ​= ​5).