Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;16:837452. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.837452

TABLE 1.

Comparison of DTI metrics of FA and MD in NAWM tracts between RRMS patients and controls using two-tailed Student’s t-test.

Location Side FA (mean ± SD)
MD (mean ± SD) 10–3 mm2 s–1
RRMS Control RRMS Control
SCR Left 0.3816 ± 0.0375 0.4307 ± 0.0577 0.7769 ± 0.0664** 0.6785 ± 0.0199
SCR Right 0.3918 ± 0.0331 0.4824 ± 0.0450 0.7976 ± 0.0731** 0.6954 ± 0.0429
SLF Left 0.3418 ± 0.0221 0.3769 ± 0.0386 0.8127 ± 0.0618 0.7523 ± 0.0380
SLF Right 0.3377 ± 0.0352 0.3871 ± 0.0458 0.8106 ± 0.0510 0.7611 ± 0.0333
ACR Left 0.3425 ± 0.0400** 0.3975 ± 0.0200 0.8397 ± 0.0716** 0.7418 ± 0.0226
ACR Right 0.3390 ± 0.0393** 0.4034 ± 0.0292 0.7403 ± 0.0817** 0.8474 ± 0.0279
BCC 0.3831 ± 0.0389** 0.4503 ± 0.0334 1.0156 ± 0.1421 0.9606 ± 0.1271
CIN Left 0.2707 ± 0.0423 0.3045 ± 0.0514 0.8690 ± 0.0659 0.8140 ± 0.0377
CIN Right 0.2642 ± 0.0381 0.0304 ± 0.0460 0.8361 ± 0.0586 0.7950 ± 0.0510
EC Left 0.3295 ± 0.0221 0.3423 ± 0.0205 0.8242 ± 0.0569 0.7698 ± 0.0392
EC Right 0.3294 ± 0.0213 0.3331 ± 0.0191 0.8322 ± 0.0504 0.7775 ± 0.0243
GCC 0.3549 ± 0.0423** 0.4227 ± 0.0369 1.1287 ± 0.0906 1.0199 ± 0.0898
PTR Left 0.4035 ± 0.0614 0.4472 ± 0.0318 0.945 ± 0.1245 0.8181 ± 0.0534
PTR Right 0.3930 ± 0.0508* 0.4534 ± 0.0266 0.8538 ± 0.0974 0.7432 ± 0.0832
SCC 0.4159 ± 0.0464** 0.5087 ± 0.0393 1.1251 ± 0.1456 1.0363 ± 0.0937
TAP Left 0.3685 ± 0.0540 0.3703 ± 0.0965 1.2971 ± 0.2899 1.5991 ± 0.3597

Significant differences of FA and MD between RRMS patients and healthy controls are shown by FDR adjusted *p < 0.01 and highly significant differences by **p < 0.001.