Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;13:831272. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.831272

TABLE 2.

Intervention of probiotics on males and their sperm.

Probiotics Study subjects and size PMID number of reference Sperm motility Sperm count Normal sperm morphology Sperm concentration Sperm volume Sperm viability Antioxidant capacity Sex hormones Inflammatory factors Others
Lactobacillus brevis [CD2], L. salivarius [FV2], and L. plantarum [FV9] Normozoospermic men who sought medical care for infertility (n = 10) 21497805
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CECT8361 and Bifidobacterium longum CECT7347 Asthenozoospermic men without any medical treatment (n = 9) 28343402 NA Sperm DNA fragmentation↑
Lactobacillus paracasei B21060 Oligoasthenotera- tospermia men (n = 20) 28245352
Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, and Streptococcus thermophiles Men with idiopathic oligoasthenotera- tozoospermia (n = 52) 32985280 NA
Bacillus subtilis KA TMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Male chickens (n = 20) 29238921
Lactobacillus coagulans and Lactobacillus casei Male Wistar rats (n = 32) 33225493 Benefit parameters of testis↑
Lactobacillus rhamnosus Gorbach–Goldin (LGG) Kunming mice (n = 18) 32265160 Sperm DNA fragmentation↑
Lactobacillus rhamnosus PB01 (DSM-14870) Male C57BL/6N Tac mice (n = 24) 29016685
C. utilis (Cu.M02) and S. thermophilus (St.S07) Male ICR mice (n = 75) 22207218
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CECT8361 and Bifidobacterium longum CECT7347 Adult zebrafish males (n = 36) 31013929

NA, not affected. Blank tables represent that the experiments are not conducted in this study.