Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;24(3):320–328. doi: 10.1111/jch.14446

TABLE 2.

The association between waist circumference and risk of new‐onset hypertension

Crude model Minimally adjusted model Fully adjusted model
Hazard ratio P Hazard ratio P Odds ratio P
Waist circumference (Per 10 cm) 1.27 [1.20, 1.33] <.001 1.27 [1.21, 1.34] <.001 1.18 [1.09, 1.28] <.001
Categories
Q1 [60.8, 76.2] Reference Reference Reference
Q2 (76.2, 82.4] 1.08 [.92, 1.26] .331 1.08 [.93, 1.27] .302 1.02 [.87, 1.19] .831
Q3 (82.4, 89.2] 1.27 [1.09, 1.48] .002 1.31 [1.12, 1.52] .001 1.15 [.98, 1.36] .095
Q4 (89.2, 128] 1.67 [1.44, 1.93] <.001 1.70 [1.47, 1.97] <.001 1.35 [1.12, 1.63] .002

Note: Crude model: nonadjusted model.

Minimally adjusted model: We adjusted for age, gender, low‐density lipoprotein, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, the administration of antidiabetic medications, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

Fully adjusted model: We adjusted for body mass index, age, gender, low‐density lipoprotein, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, the administration of antidiabetic medications, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.