Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;2022(3):CD008524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008524.pub4

Vijayaraghavan 1990.

Study characteristics
Methods Cluster‐randomised study in rural India
Participants Eligibility: children aged 1–5 years
Excluded: children with corneal involvement
Sample: 15,775 children in 84 clusters. 50.4% boys
Interventions Experimental group: vitamin A 200,000 IU given twice
Control group: placebo (arachis oil)
Study duration: unclear
Outcomes Mortality, diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections, measles
Notes Respiratory infection has non‐specific definition of "clinically significant cough".
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The villages were allocated randomly into two groups‐treatment and control".
Comment: insufficient detail to form a judgement.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient detail provided.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Blinding of participants Low risk Quote: "The trial was double blind: the investigators and medical officers did not know which were the treatment and which were the control areas. They were not aware whether the dose they were distributing was vitamin A or placebo. Decoding was done only after data had been collected".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Blinding of provider Low risk Comment: as above; probably done.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Blinding of outcome assessor Low risk Comment: as above; probably done.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient detail provided.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: incidence of infections outcome not given with respect to vitamin A and control groups. Given according to the clinical vitamin A status of all the study children.
Other bias Low risk Comment: study appeared free of other bias.