Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;42(10):2025–2038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0216-21.2022

Table 2.

Comparison of performances in the gap detection task

Sham Les R-> L Les L-> R
Linear correlation coefficients (performance vs gap length) Long gap set −0.28 ± 0.44 −0.42 ± 0.47 −0.39 ± 0.39
Short gap set −0.83 −0.811 ± 0.07 −0.91
Response rate at 10-ms gap stimulus (normalized) Total 0.31 ± 0.24 0.37 ± 0.18 0.38 ± 0.12
Long gap set 0.29 0.42 0.41
Short gap set 0.39 0.29 0.29
Gap length at 50% performance threshold (fitted) Total 8.20 ± 2.98 ms 9.23 ± 4.54 ms 11.47 ± 3.28 ms
Long gap set 7.84 ms 10.23 ms 11.76 ms
Short gap set 10.02 ms 7.47 ms 10.49 ms

Linear correlation between response rate and gap length. Response rates to 10-ms gap stimulus (rate normalized between minimum and maximum response) as well as 50% thresholds for each experimental group are given (means ± 1 SD; long gap set = experiment 3; short gap set = experiment 4).

For further information, see Results.