Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2021 May 24;237:118199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118199

Table 4.

Connectivity (rsFC) and memory (EM) outcomes for all tracts.

Tract Effect Group-Specific? Memory-Specific? Tract-Specific interpretation
IPC-Parahippocampus rsFC Yes p < 0.05 WA Yes p < 0.005 Pathway a strongly related to rsFC and EM changes
EM (one day) Trend p = 0.05 Yes p < 0.01 Yes p < 0.05
EM (one week) Yes p < 0.01 Yes p < 0.001 Yes p < 0.005
Parahippocampus-Entorhinal rsFC Yes p < 0 05 N/A Yes p < 0.05 Pathway is strongly related to rsFC changes
EM (one day) No ns No ns No ns
EM (one wee) No ns No ns No ns
Entorhlnal-Hippocampus rsFC Trend p = 0.06 N/A Trend P = 0.06 Pathway may be related to rsFC changes
EM (one day) No ns No ns No ns
EM (one week) No ns Trend p = 0 07 No ns
IPC-Hippocampus rsFC No ns N/A Yes p< 0.001 Pathway is related to episodic memory changes
EM (one day) No ns No ns No ns
EM (one week) Yes p < 0 05 Yes p < 0.05 Yes p < 0.005
IPC-Precuneus rsFC Trend p = 0.09 N/A Yes p = 0.05 Pathway may be related to rsFC changes
EM (one day) Trend p = 0 08 Trend P = 0.05 No ns
EM (one week) No ns Yes P < 0.05 Yes p < 0.05

EM = Episodic memory. ns = Not significant.