Table 1.
A compilation of review studies on sizing methodologies of hybrid renewable energy systems
| S. No. | Ref. | Year | Systems covered | Topics covered | Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banos et al. [25] | 2011 | Includes all possible combination of hybrid renewable energy systems |
Reviewed single and multi-objective optimizations for renewable energy based hybrid systems Optimization techniques reviewed: Traditional approaches Heuristic optimization methods Pareto-optimization techniques |
Concludes that heuristic approaches, parallel processing, and Pareto front-based multi-objective optimization are most promising methods for solving hybrid system design problems |
| 2 | Fadae and Radzi [26] | 2012 | Review focused on different combinations of PV/wind/diesel/battery based hybrid systems |
Studied multi-objective optimizations for hybrid renewable energy system Optimization techniques discussed: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA) |
Evolutionary algorithms such as GA and PSO are identified to be promising to find solution for many objective optimizations. |
| 3 | Khatib et al. [27] | 2013 | Study concentrates on various combinations of on/off-grid PV/wind/diesel based hybrid systems |
Reviewed size optimization methodologies for standalone PV systems: Artificial intelligence methods Intuitive approaches Numerical approaches Analytical approaches Grid-connected sizing optimization techniques discussed are: Artificial intelligence methods Intuitive approaches Numerical approaches Software based approach: HOMER |
Artificial intelligence methods are recommended to solve size optimization problem of renewable energy based hybrid system components |
| 4 | Sinha and Chandel [28] | 2014 | Review covers on various combinations PV/wind/battery based hybrid systems | Software tools reviewed are: HOMER, RETScreen, HYBRID2, iHOGA, NSEL, TRNSYS, IGRHYSO, HYBRIDS, RAPSIM, SOMES, SOLSTOR, HySim, HybSim, IPSYS, HySys, Dymola/Modelica, ARES, SOLSIM, and Hybrid Designer | Concludes HOMER as a faster, easier, and most widely used tool to evaluate the many possible system combinations. |
| 5 | Fathima and Palanisamy [29] | 2015 | Study concentrates mostly on PV, wind, diesel, and energy storage hybrid systems |
Reviewed sizing objectives, control and energy management of renewable energy based hybrid systems Mathematical model for PV, wind, diesel generators, and energy storage systems are studied |
Promising methods mentioned are: Tabu Search (TS), Honey Bee Mating Algorithm (HBMA), Multicriteria Decision Analysis Optimization (MDAO), Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA), Biogeography based optimization (BBO) Artificial Immune System Algorithm (AISA), Firefly Algorithms (FA) PSO are suitable for high dimensional problems than GA |
|
Reviewed various sizing methodologies used: Differential evolution (DE) Genetic algorithm (GA) Particle swarm optimization (PSO) Simulated annealing (SA) Ant colony algorithm (ACS) Software based approach: HOMER GAMS HYBRID2 RETSCREEN |
|||||
| 6 | Khare et al. [30] | 2016 | Concentrated on PV/wind based hybrid systems |
Discussed feasibility analysis, modeling, reliability issues, and control aspects of PV/wind based hybrid systems Optimization techniques reviewed are: Genetic algorithm (GA) Particle swarm Optimization (PSO) Fuzzy Neural Game theory |
Iterative and artificial intelligence methods are useful for size optimization of PV-wind hybrid systems, but it requires to be improved |
| 7 | Al-falahi et al. [31] | 2017 | Focused on standalone PV/wind based hybrid systems |
Reviewed various PV/wind combinations and configurations for standalone application, design parameters, and evaluation criteria for power system reliability Sizing methodologies reviewed are: Classical techniques Artificial intelligence methods Hybrid algorithms Software tools for hybrid PV/wind systems mentioned are: HOMER Pro HOMER iHOGA |
Study suggests that artificial intelligence methods and hybrid algorithms provide more accurate optimization solutions than classical techniques |
| 8 | Anoune et al. [32] | 2018 | Focused only on standalone PV/wind based hybrid systems |
Discussed different solar/wind combinations and configurations for standalone system, design parameters, and evaluation criteria Sizing methodologies reviewed are: Classical techniques Artificial intelligence methods Multi-objective approach Software based approach: HOMER, iHOGA, HYBRID2, TRNSYS, HYDROGEMS, INSEL, ARES, SOLSIM, SOMES, H2RES |
Artificial intelligence and heuristic approaches are most suitable and efficiency for solving hybrid renewable energy optimization problems |
| 9 | Lian et al. [24] | 2019 | Review coveres all forms of renewable energy sources based hybrid systems |
Reviewed various operating mode (Standalone, grid-connected), various structure of system (presence/absence of conventional source, presence/absence of storage, renewable energy used) and system performance indicators Sizing methodologies reviewed are: Analytical method, Probabilistic method, Iterative method, Numerical method, Graphic construction method, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Artificial bee colony (ABC), Cuckoo search (CS), Hybrid methods Software tools reviewed are: HOMER, iHOGA, HYBRIDS, HYBRIDS2 HOMER iHOGA HYBRIDS HYBRIDS2 |
Hybrid optimization methods are recommended for hybrid renewable energy systems research to avoid the limitations of one methodology due to their greater adaptability and optimization performance |
| 10 | Emad et al. [33] | 2020 | Study covers PV/wind/battery system |
Mathematical model for wind, solar, and energy storage systems are studied Discussed various architecture of power source configuration: DC, AC, and hybrid DC/AC coupled configurations Reviewed hybrid system Economical parameters: Net Present Cost (NPC), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), Total Annual Cost (TAC), and Cost of Energy (COE) Sizing methods reviewed are: Classical Techniques Meta-heuristic Techniques Classical and Meta-heuristic Techniques Software tool reviewed is: Homer |
Article conclude that meta-heuristic optimization techniques are more accurate and required less computational time than classical techniques |