Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;29(6):4049–4083. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09730-x

Table 1.

A compilation of review studies on sizing methodologies of hybrid renewable energy systems

S. No. Ref. Year Systems covered Topics covered Highlights
1 Banos et al. [25] 2011 Includes all possible combination of hybrid renewable energy systems

Reviewed single and multi-objective optimizations for renewable energy based hybrid systems

Optimization techniques reviewed:

 Traditional approaches

 Heuristic optimization methods

 Pareto-optimization techniques

Concludes that heuristic approaches, parallel processing, and Pareto front-based multi-objective optimization are most promising methods for solving hybrid system design problems
2 Fadae and Radzi [26] 2012 Review focused on different combinations of PV/wind/diesel/battery based hybrid systems

Studied multi-objective optimizations for hybrid renewable energy system

Optimization techniques discussed:

 Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA)

Evolutionary algorithms such as GA and PSO are identified to be promising to find solution for many objective optimizations.
3 Khatib et al. [27] 2013 Study concentrates on various combinations of on/off-grid PV/wind/diesel based hybrid systems

Reviewed size optimization methodologies for standalone PV systems:

 Artificial intelligence methods

 Intuitive approaches

 Numerical approaches

 Analytical approaches

Grid-connected sizing optimization techniques discussed are:

 Artificial intelligence methods

 Intuitive approaches

 Numerical approaches

Software based approach: HOMER

Artificial intelligence methods are recommended to solve size optimization problem of renewable energy based hybrid system components
4 Sinha and Chandel [28] 2014 Review covers on various combinations PV/wind/battery based hybrid systems Software tools reviewed are: HOMER, RETScreen, HYBRID2, iHOGA, NSEL, TRNSYS, IGRHYSO, HYBRIDS, RAPSIM, SOMES, SOLSTOR, HySim, HybSim, IPSYS, HySys, Dymola/Modelica, ARES, SOLSIM, and Hybrid Designer Concludes HOMER as a faster, easier, and most widely used tool to evaluate the many possible system combinations.
5 Fathima and Palanisamy [29] 2015 Study concentrates mostly on PV, wind, diesel, and energy storage hybrid systems

Reviewed sizing objectives, control and energy management of renewable energy based hybrid systems

Mathematical model for PV, wind, diesel generators, and energy storage systems are studied

Promising methods mentioned are: Tabu Search (TS), Honey Bee Mating Algorithm (HBMA), Multicriteria Decision Analysis Optimization (MDAO), Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA), Biogeography based optimization (BBO) Artificial Immune System Algorithm (AISA), Firefly Algorithms (FA)

PSO are suitable for high dimensional problems than GA

Reviewed various sizing methodologies used:

 Differential evolution (DE)

 Genetic algorithm (GA)

 Particle swarm optimization (PSO)

 Simulated annealing (SA)

 Ant colony algorithm (ACS)

Software based approach:

 HOMER

 GAMS

 HYBRID2

 RETSCREEN

6 Khare et al. [30] 2016 Concentrated on PV/wind based hybrid systems

Discussed feasibility analysis, modeling, reliability issues, and control aspects of PV/wind based hybrid systems

Optimization techniques reviewed are:

 Genetic algorithm (GA)

 Particle swarm Optimization (PSO)

 Fuzzy

 Neural

 Game theory

Iterative and artificial intelligence methods are useful for size optimization of PV-wind hybrid systems, but it requires to be improved
7 Al-falahi et al. [31] 2017 Focused on standalone PV/wind based hybrid systems

Reviewed various PV/wind combinations and configurations for standalone application, design parameters, and evaluation criteria for power system reliability

Sizing methodologies reviewed are:

 Classical techniques

 Artificial intelligence methods

 Hybrid algorithms

Software tools for hybrid PV/wind systems mentioned are:

 HOMER Pro

 HOMER

 iHOGA

Study suggests that artificial intelligence methods and hybrid algorithms provide more accurate optimization solutions than classical techniques
8 Anoune et al. [32] 2018 Focused only on standalone PV/wind based hybrid systems

Discussed different solar/wind combinations and configurations for standalone system, design parameters, and evaluation criteria

Sizing methodologies reviewed are:

 Classical techniques

 Artificial intelligence methods

 Multi-objective approach

Software based approach: HOMER, iHOGA, HYBRID2, TRNSYS, HYDROGEMS, INSEL, ARES, SOLSIM, SOMES, H2RES

Artificial intelligence and heuristic approaches are most suitable and efficiency for solving hybrid renewable energy optimization problems
9 Lian et al. [24] 2019 Review coveres all forms of renewable energy sources based hybrid systems

Reviewed various operating mode (Standalone, grid-connected), various structure of system (presence/absence of conventional source, presence/absence of storage, renewable energy used) and system performance indicators

Sizing methodologies reviewed are: Analytical method, Probabilistic method, Iterative method, Numerical method, Graphic construction method, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Artificial bee colony (ABC), Cuckoo search (CS), Hybrid methods

Software tools reviewed are:  HOMER, iHOGA, HYBRIDS, HYBRIDS2

 HOMER

 iHOGA

 HYBRIDS

 HYBRIDS2

Hybrid optimization methods are recommended for hybrid renewable energy systems research to avoid the limitations of one methodology due to their greater adaptability and optimization performance
10 Emad et al. [33] 2020 Study covers PV/wind/battery system

Mathematical model for wind, solar, and energy storage systems are studied

Discussed various architecture of power source configuration: DC, AC, and hybrid DC/AC coupled configurations Reviewed hybrid system Economical parameters: Net Present Cost (NPC), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), Total Annual Cost (TAC), and Cost of Energy (COE)

Sizing methods reviewed are:

 Classical Techniques

 Meta-heuristic Techniques

Classical and Meta-heuristic Techniques

Software tool reviewed is: Homer

Article conclude that meta-heuristic optimization techniques are more accurate and required less computational time than classical techniques